admin Television actor Shoaib Ibrahim has addressed the recent backlash surrounding his Kashmir vlog, which came under scrutiny following a tragic terror attack in the region. The actor, known for his roles in shows like Sasural Simar Ka and Ajooni, had posted a travel vlog from his family vacation to Kashmir just a day before the incident occurred, leading some social media users to criticize the timing and tone of the content.
The Controversy
Shoaib Ibrahim, who regularly shares glimpses of his personal life and family moments with his fans on YouTube, uploaded a scenic vlog capturing his joyful experiences in Kashmir. However, the post coincided closely with the tragic attack on pilgrims in Jammu and Kashmir’s Reasi district, prompting many viewers to question the appropriateness of celebrating a trip amid national mourning.
Soon after the attack made headlines, comments began to pour in under the vlog and on Shoaib’s social media platforms. While some fans defended him, others accused the actor of being “insensitive” for sharing light-hearted travel content during such a grim time.
Shoaib’s Response
Taking to his Instagram stories and YouTube channel, Shoaib addressed the backlash directly. He clarified that the vlog had been shot days earlier and was scheduled for upload before the attack took place. “First and foremost, I want to express my deepest condolences to the victims and families affected by the attack. It was heartbreaking news for all of us,” he said.
He continued, “People who know me, know I would never knowingly hurt anyone’s sentiments. My vlog was shot and scheduled before the tragedy, and the intent was only to share our beautiful experience in Kashmir — a place that truly touched our hearts.”
Shoaib urged viewers to avoid spreading negativity and misinformation during emotionally charged times. “This is not the time to point fingers. Let us stand together in support of those affected rather than bringing each other down.”
Support From Fans and Industry Peers
Despite the backlash, Shoaib received a wave of support from his loyal fanbase and fellow actors. Many took to social media to defend him, saying it was unfair to hold him accountable for unfortunate events outside his control. Actress and wife Dipika Kakar also shared a post expressing solidarity with the victims and reiterated their respect for the nation and its people.
A Call for Responsible Engagement
The incident has once again sparked conversations about digital responsibility and the timing of content in the age of social media. Shoaib Ibrahim’s case highlights the challenges public figures face in balancing personal expression with the collective emotions of the public during national tragedies.
As Shoaib concluded in his statement, “Let’s all pray for peace and for the safety of every Indian, wherever they are. Kashmir is and will always be a part of our soul — may it heal and shine in the light it truly deserves.”
itswheon
itswheon
itswheon
itswheon
itswheon
itswheon
itswheon
itswheon
itswheon
itswheon
itswheon
itswheon
itswheon
itswheon
itswheon
itswheon
itswheon
itswheon
itswheon
itswheon
itswheon
itswheon
itswheon
itswheon
itswheon
itswheon
itswheon
itswheon
itswheon
itswheon
itswheon
itswheon
itswheon
itswheon
itswheon
itswheon
itswheon
itswheon
itswheon
itswheon
itswheon
itswheon
itswheon
itswheon
itswheon
itswheon
itswheon
itswheon
itswheon
itswheon
itswheon
itswheon
itswheon
itswheon
itswheon
itswheon
itswheon
itswheon
itswheon
itswheon
itswheon
itswheon
itswheon
itswheon
itswheon
itswheon
itswheon
itswheon
itswheon
itswheon
itswheon
itswheon
itswheon
itswheon
itswheon
itswheon
itswheon
itswheon
itswheon
itswheon
itswheon
itswheon
itswheon
itswheon
itswheon
itswheon
itswheon
itswheon
itswheon
itswheon
itswheon
itswheon
itswheon
itswheon
itswheon
itswheon
itswheon
itswheon
itswheon
itswheon
itswheon
itswheon
itswheon
itswheon
itswheon
itswheon
itswheon
itswheon
itswheon
itswheon
itswheon
itswheon
itswheon
itswheon
itswheon
itswheon
itswheon
itswheon
itswheon
itswheon
itswheon
itswheon
itswheon
itswheon
itswheon
itswheon
itswheon
itswheon
itswheon
itswheon
itswheon
itswheon
itswheon
itswheon
itswheon
itswheon
itswheon
itswheon
itswheon
itswheon
itswheon
itswheon
itswheon
itswheon
itswheon
itswheon
itswheon
itswheon
itswheon
itswheon
itswheon
itswheon
itswheon
itswheon
itswheon
itswheon
itswheon
itswheon
itswheon
itswheon
itswheon
itswheon
itswheon
itswheon
itswheon
itswheon
itswheon
itswheon
itswheon
itswheon
itswheon
itswheon
itswheon
itswheon
itswheon
itswheon
itswheon
itswheon
itswheon
itswheon
itswheon
itswheon
itswheon
itswheon
itswheon
itswheon
itswheon
itswheon
itswheon
itswheon
itswheon
itswheon
itswheon
itswheon
itswheon
itswheon
itswheon
itswheon
itswheon
itswheon
itswheon
itswheon
itswheon
itswheon
itswheon
itswheon
itswheon
itswheon
itswheon
itswheon
itswheon
itswheon
itswheon
itswheon
itswheon
itswheon
itswheon
itswheon
itswheon
itswheon
itswheon
itswheon
itswheon
itswheon
itswheon
itswheon
itswheon
itswheon
itswheon
itswheon
itswheon
itswheon
itswheon
itswheon
